Skip to content
Friday, October 9, 2026
WiGlobal Online delivers the latest UK tech news, digital t…

Might Additional Countries Pursue Australia's Example in Prohibiting Social Platforms for Youth Under Sixteen?

Australia's controversial action to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are watching intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising number of states are considering similar bans.

  • Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our children's innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed next year.
  • Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "power of the algorithms".
  • Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "an tools in reserve".
  • In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to approve a bill lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
  • In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
  • The government in The Dutch government has advised guardians to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for minors except if parental consent is provided. While it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a solid starting point," commented a leading parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in robust research".

Last year, interest gathered behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the government vowed to further research the topic.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after being exposed to disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for minors," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, regulation is primarily happening at the local government level due to federal gridlock.

  • Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
  • Florida has passed a law barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
  • Virginia has passed a rule capping teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with additional time dependent on adult consent.
  • Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted measures requiring parental consent for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain figures to mimic Australia's path, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Outside of these regions, other nations are also considering moves.

  • Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
  • The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world agencies take a more cautious position. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve user protection.

While this global debate unfolds, the steps of Australia and its followers indicate that governments internationally are less and less prepared to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.

The writer

Jonathan White

A tech journalist with over a decade of experience covering digital transformation and cybersecurity trends across Europe.

WiGlobal Online

Type to search articles.